The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has outlined a consistent pattern of misconduct by private legal practitioner Mr. Martin Kpebu, stating that his behaviour toward OSP security personnel has repeatedly been improper and misrepresented to the public.
According to an internal brief, the OSP noted that this is not the first or second instance in which Mr. Kpebu has acted inappropriately during interactions with security officers on its premises. The Office said it has monitored his conduct over time and began recording his engagements because he often presents a contradictory public narrative after each incident.
A notable example cited was his earlier false claim about 16 petitions allegedly calling for the removal of the Special Prosecutor. When confronted on the KSM Show, he admitted that he merely repeated something he heard on a news programme without verifying it. The OSP expressed concern that a lawyer would make such a claim without factual confirmation.
Separate Processes, Separate Issues
The OSP stressed that the confrontation at its premises is unrelated to the ongoing inquiry into allegations Mr. Kpebu made against the Special Prosecutor and the institution. Despite knowing there is currently no OSP Board, he continues to insist he is “gathering evidence” to present to a board in the future.
According to the Office, he follows a predictable pattern: refusing to cooperate with investigators, demanding removal of certain officers, and introducing new allegations when his demands are met. Investigators, however, have continued their work professionally despite his non-cooperation.
Misleading Public Statements About Investigators
The OSP also refuted Mr. Kpebu’s repeated claims that the investigators handling his matter are “junior staff.” In reality, their ranks correspond to Deputy Commissioner of Police levels. His additional allegation that “the OSP is investigating itself” was described as either a misunderstanding or an intentional deception, as fact-finding panels across institutions are standard practice.
What Actually Happened on the OSP Premises
1. Events at the Gate
Upon arrival, Mr. Kpebu parked outside and conducted a media interview—something the OSP says he routinely does. Security personnel asked him to clear the entrance, so he moved near a fried yam vendor and continued the interview. When he eventually entered the compound, guards reminded him of the ban on photography and videography around the premises.
2. Escalation and Arrest
He reportedly reacted angrily to the reminder, insulted security personnel, and claimed he could act as he pleased. The brief says he further stated that both the guards and their superiors were “nobodies” who would soon be removed.
Due to his insults and obstructive behaviour, he was arrested for obstruction of officers performing their lawful duties. The OSP says the arrest followed legal procedure, involved no force, and no internal reports indicate any misconduct by officers.
Bail, Processing, and Conduct of Counsel
1. Bail Granted
After the arrest, bail was granted under standard administrative rules. One of his lawyers refused to leave the premises until he was returned, and insulted officers while causing a disruption. She was moved away without force, and the OSP commended officers for their restraint.
2. Transfer to Holding Area
He was later transferred to a secured holding area as part of routine processing. Records show he was not denied access to counsel or due process at any stage.
OSP: “No Trap, Just Accountability”
The Office dismissed claims that it “fell into a trap,” emphasizing that it simply applied the law to protect its personnel and maintain order. The OSP insisted that influence, connections, or media visibility do not place anyone above the law.
According to the Office, such behaviour would result in an immediate arrest at any major security institution, including the Police Headquarters or NIB Headquarters.
Mr. Kpebu is expected to report again today at 11:00 a.m. as investigations into the obstruction offense continue. A separate date will be announced for the continuation of the inquiry into his corruption allegations.
