Connect with us


The best city to visit but worst to live in.



The best city to visit but worst to live in. 49



In recent years, Venice has been making headlines because it’s one of the European cities where climate change has become an inescapable reality.

Flash-flooding and rising water levels along its celebrated canals aren’t the only issue locals are facing, however. Now, Venetians are moving away from their city because living costs are too high.

Thanks to both mass tourism and COVID-related price rises, many Venice locals are having to abandon their city in favour of cheaper alternatives.

“For 4 years we searched for a house in Venice. That was frustrating,” explains local boat builder Giovanni De Ponte.

“You don’t ask for them to give you money, you don’t want to go to the moon. Only a house in the city where you were born.

“We have found an apartment on another island: Murano,” he adds.


View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Euronews Travel (@euronewstravel)

This summer, the famous tourist hotspots opened up once more, drawing art, carnival and history lovers from around the world. Currently, living in Venice costs only 20 per cent less than living in New York.

After two difficult years, the global aviation industry came together to discuss and resolve post-pandemic issues and shape the future of air travel at the inaugural Future Aviation Forum in Riyadh.

How is Venice combatting its rising living costs?

Authorities are looking to fix the problem locals are facing.

Recently, we have seen a lot of the world’s most popular tourist destinations straining under an influx of post-lockdown visitors.

This has resulted in many locations limiting their visitor numbers and – in places like Thailand and Hawai’i – banning tourists altogether.

The municipality of Venice will be introducing a new system next summer. This will include a reservation process and entrance gates.

Five years ago, Venice had 67,000 permanent residents. Today, there are only 50,000 left.