Former Kumbungu Member of Parliament Ras Mubarak has called on President John Dramani Mahama to evaluate the possibility of downgrading or closing up to 22 Ghanaian diplomatic missions worldwide. This proposal aims to reduce government expenditure and reallocate funds to critical sectors.
On Saturday, June 7, 2025, Ras Mubarak shared an open letter on his Facebook page, emphasizing that closing some missions could significantly help the government save money. He stated that these savings could be directed toward vital areas such as health, education, and infrastructure development, which are essential for national progress.
Mubarak highlighted that the current economic challenges inherited by the John Mahama administration necessitate urgent cost-cutting measures. He pointed out that reducing the number of diplomatic missions is a strategic move to alleviate the financial burden on taxpayers.
The proposal aims to optimize Ghana’s diplomatic footprint by focusing on high-impact missions while reducing expenses associated with maintaining less active diplomatic posts. Mubarak believes that these measures are especially crucial given the current economic climate and the need for prudent fiscal management.
The suggestion has generated varied reactions across social media and among political analysts. Supporters argue that downsizing diplomatic missions is a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility. Critics, however, caution that such closures could affect Ghana’s international relations and economic opportunities abroad.
As of now, the government has not officially responded to Mubarak’s recommendations. Any decision to close or downgrade missions would require careful planning to balance cost savings with maintaining effective diplomatic relations.
Ras Mubarak’s call for reviewing Ghana’s diplomatic missions underscores the importance of strategic fiscal management amid economic difficulties. Streamlining diplomatic presence could be a vital move toward enhancing Ghana’s financial stability and supporting national development priorities.
Read the Full Letter below:
My Open Letter To The President of Ghana.
The President of The Republic of Ghana
Flagstaff House,
Accra.
7th June 2025.
Dear Mr. President,
FOCUS ON THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS.
Given the bleak economic situation your government inherited and the burden of such challenges on households around the country, cuts in government spending has become exceedingly crucial.
Even though you have cut spending, starting from the Presidency and reduced the number of Ministries and Ministers amongst a raft of measures, there are considerable number of areas where savings could be made.
This open letter is the first in a series of recommendations for revenue generation to address critical sectors like health, education, infrastructure etc.
I wish to focus today, on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and to propose for the downgrading and or scrapping of Ghana’s embassies in the following countries.
1. Algeria
2. Austria
3. Benin
4. Burkina Faso
5. Congo
6. Czech Republic
7. Equatorial Guinea
8. Guinea
9. Israel
10. Ivory Coast
11. Kuwait
12. Liberia
13. Libya
14. Malta
15. Namibia
16. Norway
17. Niger
18. Rwanda
19. Serbia
20. Sierra Leone
21. Trinidad & Tobago
22. United Arab Emirates.
In an era where even the richest countries are struggling to meet the most pressing needs of their people, we, a developing country, cannot afford to spend beyond our means. Difficult and painful decisions ought to be made to give the Ghanaian people the dignity they deserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR SCRAPPING
These diplomatic missions and embassies have been selected based on a combination of factors, including:
I. Low Trade Volumes. Many of these countries do not have significant trade relationships with Ghana, making the maintenance of diplomatic missions less critical.
II. Limited Diplomatic Engagement. Some of these missions are not actively engaged in substantial diplomatic activities that benefit Ghana’s national interests.
III. Cost Savings. Maintaining diplomatic missions is very costly. The cost of maintaining embassies in the above countries cost the Ghanaian taxpayer several millions of dollars yearly.
Even though a handful of Chancery buildings in places like Namibia were given to Ghana for free, there are other costs that make no economic sense.
We can’t keep paying for high rent costs while kids in schools up and down the country sit on the floor. Keeping these embassies cannot be justified when clinics in rural Ghana are an eyesore.
By scrapping these missions, Ghana can save on operational costs, including rent, utilities, salaries, and other expenses.
The cost savings from scrapping these diplomatic missions and embassies can be substantial. Based on average costs, estimate savings range in the hundreds of millions dollars annually. These funds can be redirected to more pressing areas such as:
(A) Healthcare: We have to improve our healthcare infrastructure, funding medical research, and enhancing access to quality healthcare for all Ghanaians.
(B) Education: Investing in educational facilities, teacher training programs, and scholarships to improve the quality of education and increase access to education for disadvantaged groups.
(C) Infrastructure: Developing critical infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges, and public transportation systems to support economic growth and improve the quality of life for our citizens.
(D) Housing: The concept of basic human needs are food, clothing and shelter. Our countrymen and women need affordable homes. Shelter, like food and clothing is so fundamental to human survival and wellbeing. Implementing affordable housing projects to address the housing deficit and provide decent living conditions for low and middle-income earners.
WHAT TO DO WITH STAFF FROM EMBASSIES IN THE ABOVE COUNTRIES.
Critics of my proposal may raise issue with job losses. But there will be little or no Ghanaian job losses.
Staff from the scrapped missions and embassies can be redeployed to more critical diplomatic missions where Ghana’s interests are more substantial. This will not only optimize the use of human resources but also ensure that our diplomatic efforts are focused on areas that yield the greatest benefits for the country.
The 21st century requires for governments and public institutions to be smaller, without compromising efficiency. A typical example would be what Australia, a country so advanced and prosperous than Ghana is doing. Ms. Owen-Jones, the Australian High Commissioner oversees her country’s diplomatic relations in Burkina Faso, Cote D’ Ivoire, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo. That is prudence. Even with bigger embassies in places like London and Washington, we can downsize without compromising efficiency.
An economically struggling country cannot justify keeping an embassy in Prague and Vienna when the Ambassador In Berlin cannot easily have additional responsibilities of overseeing not just Prague and Vienna, but The Hague, and Copenhagen.
What Ghana may need in these countries, I have suggested, should the proposal be acceptable to your government, is for the appointment of Consul Generals in these countries. Where we have much diplomatic and economic activities, the ambassadors should be given additional responsibilities to oversee areas with little activity.
Given the current economic challenges facing our country, it is imperative that we adopt prudent measures to manage our resources effectively in order to meet the critical and urgent challenges in health, education, infrastructure, housing, security and so on.
With prudent management and strategic decision-making, Ghana can navigate its economic challenges and achieve sustainable development.
I hope that you will consider this first of several proposals to come, and explore ways to optimize the operations of our diplomatic missions to better serve the interests of Ghana.
Sincerely,
Ras Mubarak.
Accra
